Ongoing strategies to modernize and update information architectures that are proving most successful are those that can present immediate and tangible differences to those empowered to make decisions in this regard -- many of whom are often not well acquainted with the capabilities and demands of the information architecture, and so are not especially well equipped to actually make these decisions -- and a move to wireless-based architectures can be the iceberg tip that convinces these individuals to migrate information. Conclusion

The case for migrating information away from legacy systems and outdated information architectures is quite strong, but it is not supported in current literature in a way that appears convincing to a large number of information system decision makers. Changing this requires a direct approach that demonstrates the tangible improvements in information systems designed for current needs and technologies. This will also tend to present long-term cost savings and...

& Bradford, M. (2005). New York State Agencies: A Case Study for Analyzing the Process of Legacy System Migration: Part I. Journal of Information Systems 19(2): 173-89.
NASCIO. (2008). Digital States at Risk! Modernizing Legacy Systems. National Association of State Chief Information Officers.

Pattinson, M. & Anderson, G. (2007). How well are information risks being communicated to your computer end-users? Information Management & Computer Security. 15(5): 362.

Singla, a. & Goyal, D. (2006). Managing risk factors in ERP implementation and design: an empirical investigation of the Indian industry. Journal of Advances in Management Research 3(1): 59-67.

Van der Walt, P. & Du Toit, a. (2007). Developing a scaleable information architecture for an enterprise-wide consolidated information management platform. Aslib…